Innovation Habitat: Sustainable possibilities for the society Outros Idiomas

ID:
41775
Resumo:
Contemporary society is moving in the core of a reality in which sustainability needs to be thought out and inserted through practices carried out in different dimensions of society, such as organizations, public and private institutions. This paper aims to identify the contribution of innovation habitats (IH) for sustainability in society. The methodology used was systematic review of scientific literature in one online database. As a result, it was identified: 47 scientific papers publicated since 2000, but more frequently in the last year, 2014, with 10 publications, without providing a reference author in the area. There was also a high number of papers about management and social sciences. It was noticed a short number of publications, empirical and theoretical, about practices to promote sustainable actions in the society, so this indicates the need of research on this kind of practices, with innovation environment as the driver.
Citação ABNT:
MACHADO, A. B.; SILVA, A. R. L.; BORBA, M. L.; CATAPAN, A. H. Innovation Habitat: Sustainable possibilities for the society. International Journal of Innovation, v. 3, n. 2, p. 67-75, 2015.
Citação APA:
Machado, A. B., Silva, A. R. L., Borba, M. L., & Catapan, A. H. (2015). Innovation Habitat: Sustainable possibilities for the society. International Journal of Innovation, 3(2), 67-75.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/iji.v3i2.55
Link Permanente:
http://spell.org.br/documentos/ver/41775/innovation-habitat--sustainable-possibilities-for-the-society/i/pt-br
Tipo de documento:
Artigo
Idioma:
Inglês
Referências:
ANDERSEN, M. M. Organisinginter firm learning: as the market begins to turn Green. In: DEBRUIJN, T.J.N.M.; TUKKER, A. (Eds.).Partnership and leadership and building alliances for a sustainable future. s. l.; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 103-119. 2002.

ANTTONEN, M. Greening from the front to the back door? A typology of chemical and resource management services. Business strategy and the environment, March, p. 199. 2010.

AVOLIO, G. et al. The drivers of innovation diffusion in agriculture: evidence from Italian census data. Journal on chain and network science, March, p. 231-245. 2014.

CARRILLO-HERMOSILLA, J.; RIO, P. D.; KÖNNÖLÄ, T. Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. Journal of cleaner production, July, p. 1073-1083. 2012.

CHANDRAN, V. G. R.; SUNDRAM, V. P. K.; SANTHIDRAN, S. Innovation systems in Malaysia: a perspective of university-industry R&D collaboration. Ai &Soc., v. 29, n. 3, p. 435-444. 2013.

CHARTER, M.; CLARK, T. Sustainable innovation. The Centre for Sustainable Design. 2007.

COENEN, Lars et al. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research policy, v. 41, n. 6, p. 968-979. 2012.

DLOUHÁ, J.; MACHÁčKOVÁ-HENDERSON, L.; DLOUHÝ, J. Learning networks with involvement of higher education institutions. Journal of cleaner production, June, v. 49, p. 95-104. 2013.

DUDIN, M. N. et al. The triple helix model as a mechanism for partnership between the state, business, and the scientific-educational community in the area of organizing national innovation development. Canadian Center of Science and Education (CCSE), December, v. 11, n. 1, p. 230-238. 2014.

EUROPA INNOVA. Thematic workshop: lead markets and innovation. Munich, June 29-30. 2006.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Stimulating technologies for sustainable development: an environmental technologies action plan for the European Union. 28 January COM(2004) 38 final. Brussels, 2004. Disponível em: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/etap. Accessed in: May 25, 2015.

FUSSLER, C.; JAMES, P. Eco-innovation: a breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. London: Pitman Publishing, 1996.

HINOJOSA-PAREJA, E. F.; ARENAS-ORTIZ, M.; LÓPEZ, M. C. L. The Earth Charter in compulsory education from an international perspective. Convergencia, December 30, 2014, p. 65-92. 2014.

HUPPES, G.; ISHIKAWA, M. Sustainability evaluation: diverging routes recombined? Tasks for a new working group on modelling and evaluation for sustainability. Journal of cleaner production, January, v. 15, n. 11-12, p. 1183-1184. 2007.

HUTTUNEN, S.; KIVIMAA, P.; VIRKAMÄKI, V. The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, China, September, v. 12, p.14-30. 2014.

KEMP, R.; PEARSON, P. (Eds.) Final report of the project measuring eco-innovation. Maastricht: Maastricht University, 2008. Available at: . Accessed in: May 22, 2015.

KLEMMER, P. et al. Environmental innovation: incentives and barriers: German Ministry of Research and Technology (BMBF). Berlim: Analytica-Verlag, 1999.

KÖNNÖLÄ, T. et al. Foresight tackling societal challenges: impacts and implications on policymaking. Futures, April, v. 43, n. 3, p. 252-264. 2011.

LAKATOS, E. M.; MARCONI, M de A. Scientific methodology. Sao Paulo: Atlas, 2010.

LEE, Y. Strengthening competency linkage to innovation at Korean universities. Scientometrics, January , p. 219-230. 2012.

LITTLE, A. D. How leading companies are using sustainability-driven innovation to win tomorrow's customers. s. l. : s. n.; 2005.

MATTES, J.; HUBER, A.; KOEHRSEN, J. Energy transitions in small-scale regions: what we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective. Energy policy. China, March, v. 78, p. 255-264. 2015.

MOREDDU, C.; VAN TONGEREN, F. Improving agricultural productivity sustainably at global level: the role of agricultural innovation policies. Eurochoices. China, v. 12, n. 1, p. 8-14.

OLIVEIRA, L. R.; MARTINS, E. F.; LIMA, G. B. A. Evolution of the concept of sustainability: a bibliometric test. Research reports in production engineering, v. 10, n. 4, 2010. Available at: http://www.producao.uff.br/conteudo/rpep/volum e102010/RelPesq_V10_2010_04.pdf. Accessed in: May 29, 2015. 2010.

OLIVEIRA, M. Evolution of the concept. II ENFEPro. Rio das Ostras/RJ, August 18-19. 2010. Sociedade Fluminense de Engenharia de Produção. Relatórios de Pesquisa em Engenharia de Produção da Universidade Federal Fluminense. 2010.

Oslo Manual: proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. 2005. Available at: http://download.finep.gov.br/imprensa/manual_de_oslo.pdf. Accessed in: May 29, 2015. 2005.

RENNINGS, K. Redefining innovation andecoinnovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological economics, s. l.; n. 32, p. 319-332. 2000.

SIMS, B. G. et al. Development of the conservation agriculture equipment industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Applied engineering in agriculture, June, p. 813-823. 2012.

SMITS, R. Innovation studies in the 21st century. Technological forecasting and social change, v. 69, n. 9, p. 861-883. 2000.

The moment, the challenges and opportunities of territorial economical analysis for the national development planning. Nova economia. Brazil, march, 3rd . p. 613-644. 2014.

VAN BELLEN, H. M. Sustainability indicators: a comparative analysis. (Doctoral degree in production engineering) Postgraduate course in production engineering, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2002. 250 f.

VERGARA, S. C. Projects and research reports in business administration. Sao Paulo: Atlas, 2003.